About Us
The story of how LawBot Express was built.
How it began
It was 6:00 p.m., the sun dipping behind the Aravalli ranges in Rajasthan, when it hit me: my senior wanted a bulky draft by the weekend. My expression changed. What irritated me more was the constant drumbeat from Silicon Valley, another day, another claim that artificial intelligence will replace humans. I kept thinking, “Why don’t I hear that someone has built a model that actually works like a lawyer and helps you?” Probably because they don’t see the underlying problem.
So I did the obvious thing: I opened ChatGPT and asked it to draft a pleading. It answered cheerfully, “Sure thing… let’s go ahead and prepare a draft for your case.” I fed in the relevant details, and a download link appeared. With a wave of relief and almost watery eyes, I clicked. Then lightning struck. The “pleading” was a page and a half, confident tone, little substance, the sort of thing that can get you fired in a day.
What I learned
That wasn’t the whole story. I learned these models need precise instructions; they don’t replace a human out of the box. I began giving small facts and asking it to note them and write in a particular way. It worked, on the parts I had spelled out. I stitched an entire document that way and, to my surprise, it was good enough to call a first draft. That’s how my journey with AI began. I also saw that AI won’t deliver a final draft on the first try; it needs expert input. Yes, ChatGPT shaved three to four hours off my week, but half my time went into teaching it the language and structure I needed. That had to change.
I paused my routine and went deep on AI. The hypothesis was simple: with the right instructions and drafting discipline, a system can know, up front, what to ask, how to connect facts, and how to draft like a lawyer. That research became LawBot Express.
Why I built LawBot Express
I had tried the popular chat tools. Great for outlines, sometimes inspiring. But courts don’t file outlines. They file documents with cause titles that actually match the forum, a List of Dates and Events that reads like a map not a maze, grounds that speak the court’s language, and prayers that land on point. Generic models gave vibes; I needed substance, India specific substance. So I did what advocates do when procedure gets clumsy: I rewrote it.
I started with a simple promise: build the drafting partner I wished I had. Not a robot that “spits out” a pleading, but a thoughtful junior who never gets tired, listens carefully, asks crisp questions, and gets the details right. I taught it the way I was taught: start with facts, tighten the dates, test the story, match reliefs to grounds, and never leave a hanging thread. I baked in India’s filing reality, cause titles, jurisdiction blocks, verification lines, annexures, the whole rhythm of a working draft. Then I gave it a habit: if something is missing or messy, ask, gently, clearly, and only what’s needed.
The first time it truly clicked was a simple matter with a not so simple timeline. A user typed a neat summary. The system paused and asked, “You mentioned the cheque return, do you have the bank memo date?” Silence. That was the moment I knew this wasn’t just AI. It was advocacy discipline, bottled.
How it works in practice
You share the matter, parties, facts, dates, reliefs. The system connects the dots, spots inconsistencies, and nudges for what’s missing. You stay in the driver’s seat: your tone, your strategy, your call. When you’re ready, it generates a clean, court ready draft in minutes, not hours. Not a flashy demo, not a template dump, an actual working document you can review, tweak, and file. As an advocate, I also obsessed over the quiet stuff: paragraph order, section transitions, numbering that never goes rogue, and exhibits that line up the first time.
Principles
Judgment stays human. Legal work is judgment, ethics, negotiation, persuasion, deeply human. The system lifts the heavy parts, hunting, gathering, and early stitching.
Human first, AI assisting. Accuracy over fluff. Speed with substance.
Guardrails by design. Your data stays your data. Privacy by design. Professionalism by default. I am here to make you faster and calmer, not nervous.
The road ahead
As I keep shipping, the mission grows. I am expanding the gallery, more forums, more practice areas, so common matters feel already understood. I am strengthening authorities and citations, too, because the right ruling at the right time isn’t decoration; it’s leverage. My north star is simple: when jurisprudence moves, your drafting should quietly level up with it.
What it feels like to use
Imagine the colleague who takes great notes, remembers yesterday’s call, and asks the one question that clears the fog, every time. You say, “Consumer dispute, delivery on this date, cheque returned on that date, here’s the memo.” It replies, “Got it. Two clarifications: confirm the invoice number and the exact return reason on the memo. Also, do you want the prayer urgent and time bound?” You answer. Minutes later: a court ready draft, in your voice, your strategy, your pace.
Closing
I didn’t build this to be clever. I built it because late nights taught me a better way, and because the profession deserves tools that respect its craft. LawBot Express is my way of saying: let’s keep the advocacy human and make the drafting humane.
When you’re ready, I will meet you where your matter is, half a timeline, a stack of exhibits, or just a hunch scribbled after a client call. I will listen, ask smart follow ups, and help you turn facts into a filing. Fast. Steady. Court ready.